A traffic signal warrant study can determine the need for installation through all of the following except?

A traffic signal warrant study utilizes specific, quantifiable criteria to evaluate the need for traffic signal installation. The criteria include pedestrian volumes, historical crash data, and traffic volumes, which all provide measurable evidence regarding traffic conditions and safety needs.

When considering pedestrian volumes, a warrant study evaluates how many pedestrians are crossing a particular intersection and whether this number indicates a necessity for a signal to improve safety. Similarly, historical crash data provides insight into previous accidents, helping to identify potential safety improvements that a traffic signal could facilitate. Traffic volumes assess the flow of vehicles and the presence of insufficient gaps on major streets to determine if a signal is warranted based on capacity and safety standards.

In contrast, requests from local residents based on personal experiences are subjective and do not provide the empirical data necessary for a proper warrant study. While community feedback is important in the overall decision-making process, it does not fulfill the criteria of a warrant study that relies on objective measurements, making it the exception in this context.